Understand the business.
Build the capability.

We look across the functions involved: where work arrives, who makes decisions, which systems hold the information and how one team's output reaches another. The scope may include application development, integration, Agentic Crews, staff learning and ongoing operation.

That wider view helps us choose a useful starting point. An initial workflow gives the team something concrete to test, while the design considers shared information, permissions and responsibilities that adjacent work may also need.

Some needs are best served by an existing product, a conventional integration or a clearer process. We choose the engineering around the task.

Working with Codex, Claude and coordinated agents involves more than writing a prompt. We design the instructions, information and permissions around the task, then evaluate the complete workflow.

• Orchestration and handoffs. Give each role a defined task, expected output and review point. Specify how failed or incomplete work returns to a person.
• Scoped memory. Separate working notes from reusable project knowledge. Agree who can change persistent instructions and how incorrect or outdated information is corrected.
• Retrieval, context and token budgets. Select relevant information, control how much is loaded and test the effects on task quality, latency and cost.
• Least-privilege access. Scope file and system access, tool permissions, secrets handling and permitted outbound connections. Review what information each service receives.
• Evaluation before expansion. Check representative work, exception handling and regression cases as instructions, tools or models change.

Where data handling or deployment requirements favour a local LLM, we assess an appropriate self-hosted model and hardware, including NVIDIA DGX Spark. The local model, connected tools and any cloud services have separate data flows to agree; hardware alone does not establish a private environment.

The client provides an accountable sponsor, process owners, representative users, approved information and access. Your team defines business rules, reviews domain judgments and makes the decisions reserved for it.

wGrow is responsible for the engineering and other deliverables agreed in the scope. Together, we define acceptance, change handling and who maintains each component after release. A company without developers still needs a named technical owner or provider.

Working arrangements, fees, third-party charges and ongoing support are scoped explicitly. Ownership of custom code and documentation is distinguished from platform components and third-party licences.